Відео

Sony G series, 24, 40, 50, 16-25, 24-50.

VERY GOOD REVIEW

Yes I could use a 135mm Lens for Portraiture!

I received my 907x 100C last month. As a Leica user, I found that the lack of IBIS is not an issue at all. The key difference lies in the aperture size (I shoot wide open a lot), and the 907x can be challenging to shoot in low light without a tripod. While it is a slow machine, I have had a lot of fun with it. The autofocus is sufficiently fast and very precise with the XCD 55 lens. However, I still love shooting with my Noctilux 0.95 + M11-P much more for general purposes. The build quality and the feel of manual focus are on a different level. In terms of image quality, the 907x is technically better but not much difference, it is clinical and lacks characters compared to Noctilux 0.95. In low light handheld conditions, the Noctilux 0.95 is incredibly enjoyable to shoot with, and I cannot find any competitors for the image quality in this situation except perhaps the X2D with IBIS.

It's your opinion, I'm sure your critiques are harsh to someone.

Really glad to hear your opinions regarding the mixing of color and black and white images within a single project, as that is pretty much what I’ve been contemplating of late. Not so sure when (or even if) it’ll ever come to pass, but it’s nice to know that will be an option.

Ted, thank you so much for reviewing our zine "1K radius" and giving us such a wonderful critique. We really appreciate your time and effort. Mail time is such an amazing series. There is so much inspiration and so much to learn from. The quality of the zines, books and photographs are really impressive. I hope you keep doing these videos, because they are not only helpful for the people who send you something, but also for the people who watch these videos. I also would like to mention, that I value your opinion. I don't think your critique is too harsh. You always explain why something could be improved and never leave your critique unexplained and always treat the work with respect. That is something rare and I hope you won't change the way you review these works.

Love your critiques Ted .

hi! great video:) i am still struggling between sync edits between ipad and iphone mobile for lightroom, this includes presets. they are both logged into the same account. any help? :)

Barry Thornton was the guru of sharp. He made sharpness an esthetic unto itself. There is nothing wrong with this. In fact, Thornton had an entire philosophy of photography which included a theory of human perception. Many of his photos are striking works of art. Obviously there were others like Weston and Adams who demanded sharpness. Yet, lately I have found myself drawn to the work of Sally Mann who uses large format equipment capable of great definition and yet intentionally incorporates techniques which invite randomness and imperfection. Her images are beautiful and mysterious and challenge the viewer to bring their own powers of interpretation to bare upon the work. She has proven to me that sharpness is empty if it is merely sharpness for its own sake

Your composition videos have me realizing you're good. That being said, I'm reminded of the joke: How many photographers does it take to change a lightbulb? 10. 1 to change the bulb and 9 to tell the first person how they'd have done it better.

the kit lens performs better than the 24-105L... seems like better than okay to me

looks like you got some bites . . . .

Wanted to let yall know that B&H has the absolutely beautiful Ralph Gibson signature Leica MP in stock in their used dept. Limited edition number 17/50 for not much more than a standard MP!

The lack of a view finder was my #1 decision to buy this camera. Unfortunately the camera fails to transfer photos and LUTs via the LUMIX Lab. I noticed you have the same problem seen in your video.

Brilliant Works of Old Towns and Busy Tourist Spots But The Most Unique The 1 Km Radius Project It's Like A Movie Running Through Your Mind Just Instantly Makes the Whole Movie By Small Premise of The Book Brilliant Work. 4:06 Indeed Every Street is Same. 9:17 Why is nothing written on footnote I think it delegitimise the ethical nature of human interaction with just snapping pics randomly. 12:48 Very annoying to read long fonts on the page.

Not when it comes to art. Not being true to your own instinctive judgements is far worse, for you and them. Can some possibly be more harsh then others with critiques? Sure, but that better be there concerning art. Some artist's want it, some don't. Some giving the critiques sell out their veracity to try and make as many happy as possible, because its about some money or ratings goal. Always about them choices concerning art, choose wisely.

just- do not apologise!

A good and fair critique is never to harsh if your work sucks someone needs tell that it sucks and how you can do it better.

I think you are very respectful in your critiques. You always tell people how to improve their work instead of just saying that you didn’t like this or that.

Absolutely not , you are not to harsh at all , ive learnt and so many others who watch your chanel have too im sure , from your critics. I think your critics are very balanced. What good is a critic to anyone if its not honest , keep going with it 😊

carry the RF 28-70 around and then the fifty will seem light

Your channel is very helpful to artists. Without critiques our work can become stale, or not progress at all. It may be painful at times but beneficial in the long run.

Have you looked at the XCD 35-75? Thinking of this as my first lens when I get my X2D. Thoughts??

Not at all! they are respectful, educational and sharp. Keep them up.👌

I sadly don't crtique! It becomes a confrontation! I keep my opinion to self! I was asked in past, I am old! You do a lovely chat and show so many good photographers! Do I agree? I said I won't say! Bravo!

Not harsh at all. Pretty fair across the board.

You're too nice. Rip a new one once in a while.

Harsh but not mean spirited critique could only help make us all better if we listen. Now the one offering critique should understand their final analysis is personal and the photo may sometimes be seen in a different light by the eyes of another.

No! I find it balanced, constructive and polite! Concerning the title of the video Keep up the good work

My books were the last ones! Thank you so much for showing these works, and for your input on all of these. I couldn't agree more with your critiques, and I'm grateful for them. Thats exactly what I'm looking for--real input, genuine and sincere. Definitely not too harsh. It will help me grow and make a better book in the future (and I'll be reworking these a bit). Thanks again!

At 12:00 , you mention turning the zine 45° to view a particular image. I believe you mean 90°.

No, not at all. I think you give good critique.

Since you didn't talk about it. My response in a resounding No! To the contrary, I perceived it always (and I watched all of them!) encouraging and instructive! Were I to live in your area and seek a teacher, I would knock on your door in a heartbeat! which leads me to my appeal: Please, please, please keep the viewer mail ! I photograph for four decades. I have read many photography books, and magazines and, since available, videos. Only recently I bought a Canon R, and I soon complete that with a good pc and a Canon ImagePROGRAF PRO-300, for me serious investments. The reason I trust my photography to justice such a commitment, is the confidence I developed into my photography by watching your viewer mail videos! I think it has to do with the fact that most viewers who send you mail are not professionals and often face challenges, often similar to my own. Seeing these photos reviewed by you, often provides me me an invaluable new perspective my own work!

No they are not. No doubt you bring your own perspective and experience but you always give your reasoning behind your critiques. This is all we can ask of anyone offering a critique. It’s up to the receiver to process the points given, and accept or reject them as they evaluate their own work. This is part of the learning process which is pretty sterile without outside expertise or opinions.

No people are too used to mediocre photos. Too many boring and uninteresting photos people put in there UA-cam videos. People need to stop believing their bad photos are good. I’m very selective on what I show on Instagram and UA-cam I don’t share everything.

Not at all. You are very kind and your appreciation for the work is evident. A critique naturally needs to consider both positives and negatives, as that is its fundamental purpose. I have been following your work for many years and have learned a great deal. Your critiques are always very pragmatic. Thank you for doing this.

If you can't be harsh when necessary because people are so sensitive to criticism these days, what's the point in doing it at all? Just to massage weak egos?

I am using it just over a year now and loooooove it, this is an amazing camera!!!!!!!!

No. You are a consumate Professional and your critique will make us better at our craft.

Nope. That’s honestly how you feel. Maybe some suggestions to help.

Yes. Yes they are.

❤❤❤❤❤

I've been watching your videos for over a decade. Your critique is always constructive, never destructive. Ultimately, it is up to the creator of the art to take that critique the way you intend. I think that if someone takes the way you break things down personally, they aren't looking for critique, they're looking for cheerleaders.

I watched this video when it came out. I cannot believe this is 7 years ago. Tomorrow I will see Graciela's work in London. Still hoping for more of the artists series. Thank you for introducing me to different artists. I hope it is possible to get more videos that are similar to the artist series or the AOP assignments. I know they probably are not the most profitable but I would love if there would be more of this again. Anyway. Love your channel, and I hope are doing well.

Almost done with my first book. Hoping Mail time will stick around for a little longer 🙏🏽🫡